Monday, October 29, 2012

in Resurrectione Carnis

BOOK REVIEW: N.T. Wright, Surprised by Hope

Doug Strong is a person I have tremendous respect for; so when he highly recommends a book, it get serious attention -- especially when the author is someone I already have found to be one of the leading theological voices of our time.

N.T. Wright's Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church stands out as one of the best books I've read, especially on the topic of ultimate issues, in a long time.

Wright, onetime Bishop of Durham (England) and now a professor once again at the University of St. Andrews, takes aim at common -- unscriptural -- misconceptions around the nature of heaven and the resurrection in popular culture, misconceptions that often owe more to Greek thought or sentimentalism than to the word of God. Unfortunately, many of these have permeated even the teaching and worship of the Church (e.g., through popular hymns and songs). This is not a harmless development, since it corrupts the Church's witness to the Gospel, robs believers of their true (and exciting!) hope, and tends to foster a fatalism about the world that is very contrary to the message of Jesus and the apostles. In its place, Wright sets forth a vision which is not only thoroughly Biblical, but engaging and invested in the world around us, while not losing sight of the glorious destiny of God's children.

This is truly a must-read for Christian thinkers of all stripes, including pastors and teachers of doctrine (like Sunday school teachers). Accessible without being dumbed-down, it opens a vista on the destiny of God's children that is quite irresistible. If you have to pick one Christian book of substance to read this year, you can't do better than this one.

Thanks, Tom Wright; and thanks, Doug!


[Wright, N.T. Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church. New York: HarperOne, 2008. xiv + 332 pp.]


Prince Frederick, Maryland (Providence)

"As I Urged You"

STAYING THE COURSE: 1 Timothy 1:3-4

"As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus so that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine, nor to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the stewardship from God that is by faith."

In journalism, I am told, one always leads the story with the most important piece, first. On the same principle, Paul wants to get his instruction to Timothy right on out on the table, first thing: Stay in Ephesus!

Tradition, perhaps informed by this passage, tells us that Timothy was the first settled overseer, or bishop, of the Church in that town. Ephesus was an important site in the Greco-Roman world: ruins of the library of Ephesus, one of the major research centers, remain to this day; it was also the center of the cult of Artemis (compare Diana). At the time, it was also a major port on the western coast of Roman Asia, and a small metropolis -- all belied by the relatively insignificant Turkish town (Efes) which is today's successor to the ancient city.

Research site, crossroads, cultic center, urban zone: Ephesus was a place of influence; indeed, a place whose reputation and influence went far and wide in the ancient world. It was a strategic center for Christian witness.

At the same time, it was probably not an easy place to serve. Paul was subjected to riot and abuse there, when the tradesmen found their idol-making dealerships threatened. If the tradition is true that Timothy ultimately suffered martyrdom at the hands of the pagan priests, he and the Christian community there were likely subjected to attempts at threat and intimidation long before it came to that. Little wonder, then, Timothy was subject to "frequent ailments", brought on either by rigorous fasting with prayer, or by stress!

Did Timothy want to leave Ephesus? Hard to say. Perhaps he desired an easier, or more fruitful, venue for service. Maybe he just missed his friend and mentor, Paul. Perhaps hard work brought discouragement, frustration, and depression -- what we today call "burnout". Or maybe Paul is just emphasizing the importance of the mission to Ephesus. Whatever the case, Timothy was God's man -- and the apostolic representative -- for that place at that time. He was called to "stay the course".

Where are the strategic places in the world today where Christian witness is hard, dangerous, or just frustrating -- yet where it is urgently needed? Where are the places in my community where the Gospel needs to be, because they are the crossroads points? (Starbucks, schools, soccer fields, gyms, and shopping malls all comes to mind.) Perhaps just as important, where are the places in my life and world where it is particularly important to maintain the witness, though it is tough and maybe seems like an exercise in futility, or self-immolation?

Lord, give me the staying power to be your witness in my life and world, wherever you put me. Remind me that each place is strategic in its own way, and help me to live worthily of the charge that you give me. Forgive my desire for flight or easier venues of service. Let me look to you, and be faithful to those who depend on me; remembering that sometimes, as with Paul and Timothy, those on whom I think I depend are also truly counting on my service as well. In the Name of Christ. Amen.


Prince Frederick, Maryland (Providence)

Friday, October 26, 2012

"Grace, mercy, and peace"

DISCIPLESHIP STEPPING STONES: 1 Timothy 1:2 (part 3)

To Timothy, my true child in the faith:
Grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Lord.


Paul, having recognized in Timothy his "true child" in the faith in Christ, now goes on to adorn his salutation with a benediction.

Grace. The word charis means "favor", especially of the undeserved kind. St. Augustine categorized grace into "operating" and "co-operating"; John Wesley further compartmentalized it into "preventing" (we say "prevenient"), "justifying", "sanctifying" and even "glorifying". But it is all one, even though it operates differently for us: God's love, vectored toward us as favorable regard.

It is hard to get the mind around this. In a world where services must be bought, grades earned, wages merited, and budgets balanced, something true and free is hard to grasp. I get a gift, I feel the obligation to offer one in return. Someone does me a kindness, and I'm looking for ways to repay it. Here in Southern Maryland, when someone brings over a dish of food to assist during an illness or following a death, the vessel is returned to its owner not only clean but full of some food, treat, or accompanied by flowers or some other offering. We talk the language of free gifts, but how hard it is for us truly to understand it!

God is gracious. Even in the language of faith, we hear, "Christ died for the sins of the world", and we think, on some level, "That's darned nice of him to do." It's not until we realize that Christ gave Himself to forgive (in Wesley's words) my sins, even mine, that we truly begin to know how to respond. As John Newton exclaimed, "Amazing grace! How sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me!" It is easy to confess others' sins; harder to acknowledge our own. It is easy to intellectually assent to the idea of grace; infinitely harder to receive it. But what joy there is in knowing that the Savior is not just the Savior of the world; He is the Savior of me!

Mercy. The word is eleos, and stems from "to help". Mercy is God's grace, targeted to help me in a particular way. In what way? This depends on my need. God forgives my sin. God delivers me from sickness, or ignorance, or death, or bondage to addiction, or the power of Satan ... or all of the above. If grace is an arrow, mercy is the entry wound on my life, a wound which destroys the power of death and brings healing in its wake.

I deserve nothing but death, bondage, sickness and destruction. Not because I was made that way, but because of my own choices and the common lot of a very broken and corrupted humanity. Grace means that God moves toward me for good; mercy means that the movement is effective on my behalf for life, freedom, healing and resurrection; and the result in my experience is ...:

Peace. Eirene is the Greek, picking up the meaning of the ancient Hebrew shalom. Not just the end of violence and chaos, but an utter "rightness", when all is as it is created to be. This peace is the effect of God's grace and mercy, and slowly invades the individual life and through our lives, the world around us. It is a contagion to be spread; it is a work to be built; it is a feast to be shared at the table of God's acceptance, when the hands have been washed by God's righteousness.

These are three gifts from God. But there also seems to be a sequential aspect to them, like stepping-stones: grace to mercy, mercy to peace, all from God in Christ.

Lord Jesus Christ, I deserve none of your gifts. But it is your will that I and all your human creation receive all of them. First your favor, then the effects of it, then the experience of wholeness which it brings. Let me, having been blessed by these things, turn and strengthen my brothers and sisters and extend the news of your gracious presence to the world. For your own dear sake, and out of love for your children I beg this of you. Amen.


Prince Frederick, Maryland (Providence)

Thursday, October 25, 2012

"To Timothy"

PROTEGE OF AN APOSTLE: 1 Timothy 1:2 (part 2)
Just who was Timothy?

His name (Greek Timotheos) means either "one who honors God" or (less likely, I think) "honored by God". It turns out that most of what we know about him comes from the New Testament, in which he is shown to be a protege of the apostle Paul. The son of a Greek (Gentile) father and observant Jewish mother (Eunice) and grandmother (Lois -- see 2 Tm 1:5), he traveled with Paul on his missionary journeys. Paul had met him at Lystra, and arranged for his circumcision as a Jew, for the sake of the mission to the Jews (Ac 16:1-3). The author of Hebrews tells us that a Timothy (presumably the same person) was imprisoned but then released, a sign of his suffering for the sake of Christ. He also had strong ascetic traits, for instance frequent fasting; hence Paul's encouragement to him to make medicinal use of wine (1 Tm 5:23).

Other early Christian sources tell us a little more. Eusebius (History of the Church 3.4) tells us that Timothy became the first bishop of Ephesus, and was evidently Paul's troubleshooter and undershepherd there, as Titus was on the island of Crete. That's suggestive, since tradition also tells us that the Blessed Virgin Mary Theotokos and John the Apostle both spent their last days at Ephesus, which may mean that Timothy was their pastor. If this is true, it's a second tie between the Theotokos and Paul, the other being Luke the Evangelist and (traditionally) first iconographer, whose first work was of the Virgin.

He is believed to have been martyred at Ephesus during the reign of the Roman emperor Nerva by enraged pagans, for honoring God (timo-theos!) by opposing idols.

Timothy learned this reverence of God on his grandmother's knee and at his mother's breast, and under the guidance and tutelage of his mentor Paul. A generation after the man from Tarsus laid down his life for the Gospel of Christ, Timothy followed, but not before serving long and well as the trusted leader of one of the most important sees of the Christian Church.

Lord, thank you for the example of Timothy, and for his faith. Enable us to learn well and to teach well, so that those who are guided by us and who follow us will also minister well and faithfully to your people, blessing Your own heart. Let me, also, be truly found to be "one who honors God". Amen.


Prince Frederick, Maryland (Providence)

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

"To Timothy, My True Child in the Faith"

BORN TO REPRODUCE: 1 Timothy 1:2
Paul now identifies his addressee: Timothy, his protege. Paul refers to him as "my true child". This should raise several ideas in the mind.

Each of us should ask himself / herself: Who are my children in the faith? Who has come to Christ because of my testimony? Hopefully this includes any natural children (if applicable) -- our kids at some point make decisions for themselves; but we, like Augustine's mother Monica, can be fervently praying and using our gentle, loving influence to try to guide them to the Cross and to faith.

But it's not just about our natural children, grandchildren, or others who are part of our socially-recognized nurturing responsibility. The circle extends to friends, coworkers, fellow-students ... in fact, every life we touch. As C.S. Lewis said: You have never met a mere mortal. Each life is move a little closer to Heaven, or to hell, by your influence and mine. Who are our children in the faith, and how are we feeding, tending, encouraging, challenging, and protecting them?

There's no question that John and Nicholas belong to Elizabeth and me: their looks and their personalities, though different, each bear the stamp of their parentage very clearly. They are our "true children". What of our children in the faith? Are they "true children"?

Each of us must first ask: do they bear the stamp of my character, my influence? Have I given myself, poured myself into them, opened my heart and life so that they can see who Christ is in and for me? Most of all, are they themselves reflecting more and more the character and likeness of Jesus Christ? For that is what is most important.

And if they are our "true children", it is for us to ask whether there is some alloy we are risking putting into the pure substance of their faith, character, and life. Is my heart single toward Christ? Or is there something else that I am passing on, some flaw, some admixture, some dross or brokenness? I have asked this question on numerous occasions regarding our missionary work in the world, and what the Western, especially American, church exports in our church planting elsewhere. Are we planting our problems all over again, along with our churches? Congregations of local churches should ask this: what kind of disciples are we making? Are they "true children" of Christ? And I must ask the same question of myself: am I planting my failings and misunderstandings, along with sharing the Master's love and example and the lessons of faith? May it not be so! But it reminds me of my responsibility, and the call to be ever on guard. Satan is subtle. But Christ is both stronger and wiser still.

In 1955, Dawson Trotman gave a 47-minute talk called "Born to Reproduce". (You can read it here: http://www.navigators.org/us/ministries/college/navfusion/assets/BorntoReproduce.pdf)Trotman, founder of the Navigators, understood this to be part of the very core of what it means to be a disciple of Jesus Christ. Every species must reproduce or die; but while each individual human may not have natural offspring, and extinction of the Church is guaranteed by Christ not to happen, every Christian believer is responsible to use those opportunities that God gives to work at replicating the chromosomes of faith in the life of another ... in the lives of others.

Who are our children "in the faith"? And are they true?


Prince Frederick, Maryland (Providence)

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

"By the Command of God"

WHO CALLS?: 1 Timothy 1:1 (part 2)
Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by command of God our Savior and of Christ Jesus our hope ...

The first striking aspect of this verse is the reference to "God our Savior". We often hear the phrase "our Savior Jesus Christ". Here, though, Paul says "God our Savior". So we understand, just as in John 3:16 and other passages such as 1 John 3:1 and 4:19, that it is of God's eternal purpose that God's own creation be redeemed, and that God is the primary Actor in our salvation. This gives the lie to the idea that the God of the Old Testament is a vengeful and judging and even capricious Dictator, where the Savior is kind, loving, and forgiving. God is the loving Father, the eternal Spirit of both love and justice, who has purposed to redeem and restore all of His creation. Moreover, because we believe that God is revealed as Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, we understand from the apostle that the whole of the Godhead is bending toward our salvation.

The second striking feature of the passage is the double mention of "Christ Jesus". Paul is an "apostle" (apostolos, "one who is sent") by Christ Jesus; and he also identifies the same Christ Jesus as the end of his quest and every believer's ("our hope"). Christ is therefore both the origin and basis, but also the end and goal, of our life's purpose.

There are two ways at least of understanding this. One, and I think the wrong way, is to see Christian profession as the limitation of our personhood. The great science fiction writer Robert Heinlein, himself an atheist, pointed this way when he maintained, "The worshiping mind is not a creative mind." This is to make Christ a barrier that one cannot get across. But this is a mistake: the fashioner of our minds, our hearts, our creativity, our very dreams when whole and healthy, is the limitless Mind and Heart which created all things and set before us and all beings an open future.

The other way is to consider this belonging a bit like being part of a family. I was born into my clan, my tribe, my nuclear home gang; and, having lived my life connected to them directly or not-so-directly, I will always belong there and pass from this life with my identity still rooted in that belonging. What I do with that identity is up to me -- but it is a big part of defining who I am. Even if I should abandon the family connection and take another name, that name too will be part of my self-definition. As a Christian, we are born anew into the family of God by the grace of Christ; and that identity is part of our inheritance and points us onward to the great destiny which belongs to all of God's true children.

Christ is "our hope". Hope implies something identified, but not fully realized; a goal, an end. He is our hope because He has made us His own. He is our hope because we look to make all that we do serve His purpose, and win His approval and applause. He is our hope because He has begun to reform creation, un-corrupting and healing that which has become broken and corrupted through sin and rebellion.

He is our hope. When that Hope is the one who has called and named and identified, how can one go wrong? What confidence this brings! What daring it can inspire! And this is exactly how Paul is fired -- and so is able to encourage the protege he will now begin to address in the letter.


Prince Frederick, Maryland (Providence)

Monday, October 22, 2012

"Paul, an Apostle"

CONSIDERING THE CALL: 1 Timothy 1:1
Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus ....

Paul's letters to Timothy have always stood out for me as reflections on the nature and meaning of the vocation of ministry with Christ's Church, and into the world. When I was a college student and again as a seminarian, they often formed the basis of my devotional reading as I considered where and how God calls to ministry, and my place in that. In these latter days as I am reflecting again on vocation, I find myself irrepressibly drawn once more to these Scriptures.

"Paul, an apostle". An apostle is one who is sent: that is the meaning of the Greek apostolos. Sent by whom he is about to answer in a minute; but one is not sent for no purpose, so we are right to ask, sent for what?

He is sent to tell. Paul always understands his first call as that of proclaiming the message of Christ crucified and raised, His cross, His power, His grace, His restoration of all things. He has a message which is the guiding principle of his life, because Christ is the central Person in his life.

He is sent to plant. Paul is a pioneer, not a settler; he sees his mission as establishing churches and then visiting again long enough to ensure that they are growing and thriving, responding to problems and conflicts as they arise. He is ambitious in his zeal for Christ, willing to endure the labor no matter how breakbreaking in a stony field, as long as the planting is done.

He is sent to serve. He is a "tentmaker" (literally! the first one!), so to outward appearances he "works for himself". But his occupation (artisan) is the support mechanism for his vocation (disciple-maker). No doubt, he wove the two together where he plied his trade; but his real labor was on behalf of the Lord's churches. He serves Christ by serving Christ's people.

He is sent to be sent. This may sound odd; but Paul went on four missionary journeys (at least, of which we have information), and they built upon one another. The more he did, the more he could do; the more he was faithful, the larger his field grew. He was sent now, not only for the needs of now, but to build the ministry scaffolding to be sent later. I dare to imagine that in God's economy, he continues to be sent, in ways which we cannot begin to dream.

"Paul". His Hebrew name, "Saul", was the name of the first King of Israel, a tall and handsome Benjaminite, the kind of alpha-male that men naturally follow and make women go a little weak in the knees. This Paul was apparently not much to look at, nor even a superb orator (witness poor Eutychus!). But his labor of planting and teaching and discipling changed lives. "Paul" -- Greek "Paulos" -- is Hellenized from the Latin "Paulus". Paulus was a Roman surname of some significance, and we know that Paul was a Roman citizen from the time of his birth in Tarsus. But the word also means "small" -- could it have been a nickname, like my uncle who was always known in the family as "Shorty"? An unremarkable presence, an unremarkable name, for a man who was made quite remarkable, set aglow by Christ.

Paul, an apostle. Not of his own doing, but by another -- for one is not "sent" by oneself. That is for later.


Prince Frederick, Maryland (Providence)

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Smooch and Relate

BOOK REVIEW
On the way home from Seattle, I had the chance to finish Dr. Donna Gibbs' book Kiss & Tell: Truths That Will Transform Your Marriage. This compact work (under 150 pages) was given to me; and honestly, I wish I had known about it a couple of years ago, about the time it was published -- it might have been a real help in my own marital situation.

Dr. Gibbs, or "Dr. Donna" as she is known in her home community of Hendersonville, North Carolina, is a Christian counselor specializing in marriage work. In her book, she offers ten principles which she recounts as Biblical keys to a successful marriage. They are: (1) centering the marriage on Christ; (2) praying (together); (3) healthy communication; (4) protecting the marriage against the "unacceptables"; (5) preparing for and dealing well with stress; (6) good financial priorities, planning, and management as a couple; (7) investing in quality time; (8) studying to be the expert on your partner; (9) competing to put the other's needs first; and (10) making room for laughter.

None of these is a dramatic revelation, or rocket science. The book is poorly edited in spots, such as on p.127 where Hosea's wife is named as "Homer" rather than "Gomer". In numerous places, word choice or metaphors don't quite work. Still, these are quibbles. While not providing earth-shatteringly new information, the way in which
Gibbs weaves the insights together and humanizes them is uplifting and potentially very helpful, especially to couples who, like many, feel isolated and as though they must be unique in their struggles.

The gift of marriage is one of God's great gifts. This work, like the classics "Letters to Karen" and "Letters to Phillip", could be a good resource for premarital couples; or still more, I think, for those who are a couple of years into the marriage, beyond the honeymoon stage and well into the long-term serious work of making their union work.


[Gibbs, Donna. Kiss & Tell: Truths That Will Transform Your Marriage. Bloomington, Indiana: CrossBooks, 2009. xvii + 129 pp.]

Prince Frederick, Maryland (Providence)

Friday, October 19, 2012

Journey to the Emerald City

SEEING THE SIGHTS IN SEATTLE

It's always enjoyable visiting the Northwest, and this time was certainly no exception. The flights in on Tuesday were a little bumpy, but the excellent service by Alaska Airlines certainly made up for it. In the afternoon, I was treated to a behind-the-scenes tour at one of the mission agencies here in the Puget Sound region, and got to see how state-of-the-art technology and know-how is being harnessed to the work of serving God by serving the poor around the world.

Next morning, there was some time available to see a bit of the city. "Lonely Planet", the outfit which publishes guides for tourists the world over, also maintains a website with advice on top sites for different locations. Picking several, I set out to see some sights that hadn't yet made the agenda on previous visits, plus one that I just wanted to see again.

The first stop involved a drive over to the Ballard section of town, to the Hiram M. Crittenden locks, or rather the salmon ladder next to the locks. Wanting a bit, I made a stop at Nellie's, a lean-to coffee bar adjoining the Lockspot Cafe. There Jeanette (pronounced the French way, zhen-ETTE) and Todd made up a delicious steaming cup of hot, bold coffee, plus a thick slice of toast with butter and cinnamon. Just the ticket on a morning when the temp was in the mod-40's and I had to go back to the car for my jacket.

Access to the locks, which were built by the US Army Corps of Engineers, is via the Carl S. English, Jr., Garden, a lovely collection of paths and trees and perfectly-maintained plants. There are two locks, one large and the other much smaller, and it was fun to watch them both in operation. The system connects the access to Puget Sound with Lake Union and ultimately Lake Washington to the east. During my visit, which was also in the company of a school group that appeared to be from the Far East, we watched a large scowl or barge pass through the larger lock, and several fishing and pleasure boats make their way through the smaller. The whole process took maybe 40 minutes, and was a delight to watch. The salmon ladder was also fascinating; it is toward the end of the salmon migration season, but a few were still making their way into the system and past the observation windows. King, Sockeye, Coho -- and soon, the Steelhead will be coming through.

From there, the next stop was in the Fremont section of town -- Seattle's answer to Greenwich Village, with a little Haight-Ashbury or Adams-Morgan thrown in -- driving past the statue of Lenin (brought to Seattle after the collapse of the USSR), to see the strange bit of public sculpture titled, "Waiting for the Interurban", a collection of bystanders waiting by an empty platform. The figures get dressed up for different occasions; when I was there, one of them was wearing a birthday hat and was surrounded by balloons. The figures are still "waiting" as the whole collection is a protest for the commuter train which was to be built, and for which the neighborhood is still waiting. I have been told that the dog in the collection bears the face of the politician who delayed and ultimately blocked the project -- a fact which was not revealed until the unveiling of the statue.

From there it was down to the heart of town, near Pioneer Square, for the National Park Service's Klondike Gold Rush Museum. On the way, I stopped at the Waterfall Park, built by UPS on the site of their first-ever office, where the famous brown-van delivery service was born. The Klondike Museum is free, and a real gem, with lots of interesting facts and stories about the great rush to the Yukon in 1897-1898, in which Seattle played an important part. Some 100,000 persons set out for the Klondike, of which about 40,000 made it there; some 20,000 prospected for gold, and just a few hundred realized any appreciable wealth, or about 0.33%. After the Northwest Mounted Police (today known as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, or Mounties), fearing widespread starvation, ordered that each "stampeder" had to bring supplies for a year, Seattle merchants helpfully drew up lists of supplies and helped to provision, at a cost of around $350 per person -- about $10,000 in today's dollars. The movie was also great; it's well worth an hour or so.

After stopping for a delicious sandwich of jerked turkey at Rex's Deli, I went to the Seattle Art Museum, a world-class collection in a gorgeous modern building expanded and refurbished about 2007. The visitor is greeted in the entrance atrium by a white car -- one of nine, mostly suspended from the ceiling at various angles and stretching across the museum -- before going upstairs to the excellent collection of paintings, porcelains, religious art, and most notably African, East Asian, and Native art from the Northwest, British Columbia, and Alaska. The $17 ticket was well worth the price.

The day finished off beautifully with pizza at the Wallingford Pizzeria, which my son John has acclaimed the "best in Seattle", and perhaps even better than the family's favorite deep-dish pizza house in Chicago. (I'm not sure I agree, though the pizza was super-good.) We had one with goat cheese, spinach, and some anchovies standing in for the salami (which I can't eat), washed down with excellent local suds. Father-son bonding lingered over a long coffee chat as the evening grew dark.

All in all, a fabulous day. Seattle continues to amaze and satisfy.


Seattle (Queen Anne), 19 October 2012


Wednesday, October 3, 2012

MUSINGS FROM A TRAVELLING WORSHIPER

My, this has been an eventful summer.

One of the silver linings of my absence from the church this summer, was the opportunity to visit a number of churches: five churches, six weeks in all. For the interested, this is a short sketch of the experiences.

A surprising aspect of those weeks was a craving for the consolatory features of liturgy, that "traditional" (what a misused word!) aspect of the ancient worship of the Church.

Accordingly, the first week I visited the main Russian Orthodox church in Washington, St. Nicholas on Massachusetts Ave., kitty-corner to the much larger, but less ecclesiastically elevated, St. Sophia Greek Orthodox Church. (St. Sophia looks like a cathedral church. St. Nicholas is one.) This was not my first visit to St. Nicholas, where there is liturgy on steroids: the Old Church Slavonic liturgy of the Church, rooted in Byzantium and tracing its roots to the misty, pre-Irenaean roots of Christian worship. Though I could not commune -- and as a Protestant, I always have to adjust to the different ethos of congregants' coming and going throughout the service -- it was soothing and refreshing to my troubled spirit. At the end, I joined the line for the blessed bread and diluted wine distributed to the congregation (not the Eucharist, which is reserved for those baptized in the Orthodox communion). While I prefer for congregational participation, it was a true tonic on a day when standing (for about 2 hours -- seats are for the elderly and infirm only) and attending was about all I could manage. It was all that was needed. Though we may sniff at what some call the "superstitious" or "idolatrous" aspects of Eastern Christian piety, what is more important is that grace abounds in all God's houses where the Lord is honored, and He met me there.

The next week, still hungering for liturgical worship (and not wanting to drive as far), I attended a Lutheran church across the river in Charles County. The pastor, a large and friendly man with large and strong hands that made me think of a butcher's, welcomed me before the service as he made his way through the congregation. (I was sitting at the back, hiding out openly like so many who have visited my parishes over the years.) "Nice to see you again," said the man whose church I had never visited before -- making me wonder how many times I've done the same thing. But he was very friendly and I liked him immediately; and he delivered himself of a good, Scripturally-rooted sermon on Ephesians 5:21 ff. (The one thing I didn't like was his concession to contemporary prejudice with his statement that he didn't know whether it was more dangerous to read that passage, or to preach on it. Otherwise, he did a great job.) The service music, though simple, was plentiful, rather like a Pennsylvania Dutch lunch. The very Lutheran emphasis on grace and relatively weak protreptic made my Wesleyan sensibilities yearn for him to tell us to do something -- yet I left refreshed and ready for the week. And reminded that, for all that, it isn't "about me". It's about Christ.

On the third week, Nick and I were planning to do some sightseeing in Washington, so we visited a church that was -- sort of -- on the way. We attended a tiny Anglican (not Episcopal, note) chapel in lower Anne Arundel County, a historical building where the 1928 Book of Common Prayer is still honored and used. We were there for the early prayer service, and together made up 40% of the congregation of 5 persons, one of whom was the organist. (We were told that the later service would be much better-attended, as there was a baptism scheduled for that morning.) The beautiful Cranmerian prayers of the '28 Prayer Book and the readings (from KJV? Geneva Bible?) were lovely. The pastor, a friendly man with long grey-white locks who looked like he stepped out of the late 18th century, delivered an ex tempore meditation on forgiveness that spoke to my mind, if it didn't quite touch my heart. Nick seemed to enjoy the service; and at the end, everyone (all 4 of them, including the rector) welcomed us warmly and said they were glad we came (clearly indicating the small number of worshipers, and clearly very sincere!). Two take-aways from this experience: one, that it doesn't matter how small the congregation is, it's important to give it one's all, as the clergyman clearly did. Second, the witness of presence, even with small, even tiny, numbers, is powerful. They were there for us on a Sunday we needed them to be -- even though we may never visit there again. They make a witness for the Word of God in Scripture and heart-felt worship. A gentle rebuke to our worship of numbers in Methodism -- and much of the Protestant tradition.

By the next week, I was ready to take a chance on hitting something contemporary -- strange reaction, isn't it? given my usual preference for contemporary worship, but it just felt wrong in a context of heart-pain -- I looked up some of the area non-UM but Wesleyan-tradition congregations. That's how I found New Life Church, a congregation of precisely The Wesleyan Church in the La Plata area (whose campus is cheek-by-jowl with that of South Potomac Church on US-301). This parish (if one can call it that) has overlapping services in three buildings on the same campus. My first week, I went to the service in the main building -- where I was greeted warmly at the door, and invited to sample the snacks (cheese! grapes! cookies! coffee! orange juice! -- and you can take it into the worship space!). The service was well-done contemporary with a good band -- loud enough that anemic congregational singing wouldn't matter but not overpowering. The simple (Wesleyan!) decor featured a large, rugged cross, and a warm, carpeted feel. The pastor delivered a very, very basic (intentionally so) message on the first of three "ABC's" of repentance and salvation -- "admit" -- and was very engaging. I liked him immediately (though if the preaching is always at or near this level, I'd grow restless in a few weeks), and was blessed by the call to trust in Christ in all things, including dealing with our sins, our need, our struggles. There was a very Methodist call to DO something about one's faith, and clear signs that this congregation is on the move through its outreach-- and plans to plant a second campus in Waldorf, just to the north. I decided to visit this congregation again, and attend a different service, thinking it might be more traditional.

On my next visiting opportunity, two weeks later, I did just that. But the "Kneeling Point" service, rather than being traditional, was just a different demographic (older), led by what seemed clearly to be the "B team" in terms of both preaching and music. There was something charming and nice in this: perhaps it is a built-in laboratory for those who need to grow and develop their worship-leading talents.

On the whole, I'm really impressed with New Life, as someplace which is focusing on the essential basics in a good way, and on the move, and is open to do what is needed to reach people. If I lived closer than 45 minutes away, I'd look for ways just to drop in more frequently.

My last week of visiting before retirement took me quite local -- again, to a place where I knew I'd find the comfort of liturgy, this time in the Western rather than Eastern mode. I went to St Francis de Sales, just over in Benedict across the Patuxent from Calvert County. Again, a good homily: not riveting, but very thoughtful, with some nuggets that will be helpful to me in some work that I'm doing. I take it the parish is very, very traditional: they offer the mass ("extraordinary office") in Latin twice weekly in addition to their English-language offerings, and Communion was in one kind. (Did the sixteenth century really never happen?) But the feeling was of a warm and loving parish, and snatches of the service music have continued to echo in my head all week at unguarded moments, and blessed me. I also got a Catholic newspaper to read -- man, they don't like the current administration or the direction of the DNC! But again, not the rants that one too often hears from the reactionary (mainly Protestant) right, but thoughtful, and historically-nuanced, critique. While I don't ever see myself becoming a Roman Catholic, there is much in Roman piety to commend itself -- as many Protestants have found, including in such (unlikely?) places as Cursillo/Walk to Emmaus.

This week, it will be a new adventure. I trust, anyway. But in all of these settings, one thing stands out -- something I, as a pilgrim, certainly needed:

"The Lord is in His holy temple. Let all the earth keep silence before him."

Amen.


Prince Frederick, Maryland (Providence)